Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Karl Kesel's avatar

WINGDINGS: When I started writing my creator-owned comic IMPOSSIBLE JONES, I knew she'd be the sort of character who would swear— not regularly, but when needed— yet I write generally very family-friendly comics, and wanted to be able to give IMP to anyone who was interested. And I #*&! hate the use of Wingdings! Pulls me right out of the story every time. So what to do…?

My answer: redact the swearing! For some reason this seemed to fit the tone of the IMP book perfectly, since IMP had a subtle meta-quality, with occasional winks to more mainstream characters and such. Plus, I left just a hint of the redacted word showing— barely enough that my son could figure out what was actually being said. Which both shocked and delighted him. I will go to my grave believing that if you do something that your reader can figure out for themselves— that makes them feel SMART— that is not a bad thing to do.

Of course, redaction wouldn't work with all comics. But I feel Wingdings NEVER work.

FANTASTIC FOUR MOVIE: 2 things…

1) When I saw you at the World Premiere (which was a once-in-a-lifetime blast for Myrna and myself) you said you'd seem the movie already, before the World Premiere. I've since heard that there were some last-minute edits to FF after SUPERMAN came out. I wondered if the version you saw earlier was any different from what we saw that evening? And if so, in what ways? I'm kinda jonesing to see Malkovitch as the Red Ghost, myself…

2) You should have gotten a THANK YOU credit at the end of the movie, Tom. Yeah, you're the editor, yeah, it's your job, but you have helped shape the FF in ways subtle and direct for a long time now, and I believe you deserve credit for that. My story about Ben being Jewish only exists because you green-lit it. And that's the smallest tip of the iceberg. I tip my hat to your hat, my friend.

Deborah's avatar

Hi Mr Brevoort

Regarding your reply to Oscar's question about Dr Doom in your blog of August 3rd, in which you said that the X-Men are suffering from the fact that all their well known villains have been their next door neighbours for half a decade and people might want to see them as villains again, I just want to say that I know Magneto is still regarded by many as the foremost X-Men antagonist and was portrayed as such in the Fox movies, but in the comics he has been the X-Men's 'neighbour' and even an actual X-man for an awful lot longer than half a decade. In fact, since the Utopia era he's never really been the X-Men's true enemy even if he didn't get along with all their factions. So that's getting on for twenty years rather than half a decade.

And, at the end of that half a decade (by which I assume you mean the Krakoa era), he got the best character progression story in Al Ewing's Resurrection of Magneto that he's had since UXM 150 came out in the 1980s. I can't be the only fan, I'm sure, who would be saddened to see that character progression rolled back yet again. Why can't this character ever be allowed to really learn and change instead of the endless cycle of reformation/recidivism, reformation/recidivism that just seems to go on and on? For one, it's a really downbeat story to tell, for two, it's been done so many times before.

If it's something to do with the new X-Men movies many years down the line then that is a crying shame is all I can say. Magneto as the main villain has already been done in X-Men movies. It's time for some new villains to step up.

Thanks for taking the time to interact with the fans. I may not often like what you have to tell me but I appreciate you doing it.

59 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?